Ozonated Water Decreases In vitro Contamination at Dental Implant Interface in Different Connections
Eder José Cruz
Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, UNINGÁ, Maringá, Brazil.
Renato Bitencourt Rosado
Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, UNINGÁ, Maringá, Brazil.
Lucas Trevisan Suzzin
Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, UNINGÁ, Maringá, Brazil.
Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas
Department of Orthodontics, UNINGÁ, Maringá, Brazil.
Ana Paula Uber
Department of Microbiology, UNINGÁ, Maringá, Brazil.
Mariana Aparecida Lopes Ortiz
Department of Microbiology, UNINGÁ, Maringá, Brazil.
Samira Salmeron *
Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, UNINGÁ, Maringá, Brazil.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aim: Cases of peri-implant diseases have increased, highlighting the need for preventive and therapeutic protocols. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ozonated water on In vitro decontamination of implant-abutment interfaces in external hexagon (EH) and morse cone (MC) connections.
Study Design: In vitro study.
Place and Duration of Study: Sample: Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry of Ingá University Center – UNINGÁ, between June 2020 and December 2021.
Methodology: Twenty-four implant-abutments (IA) in EH (n=12) and MC (n=12) connections were divided into groups: negative control (NC) – sterile IA; positive control (PC) – IA contaminated with biofilm; and ozone (O) – IA contaminated with biofilm and decontaminated with ozonated water (60µg/mL,1min). The effectiveness of ozonated water was evaluated by counting colony-forming units (CFU/mL), and both connection types were compared.
Results: There was a significant difference among groups in both connection types, outside and inside the implants (P=0.000). Group O showed a significant decrease in CFU/mL compared to group PC outside and inside the implants for EH and MC connections (P=0.000). Only group O in the EH connection presented a significative difference in CFU/mL compared to outside and inside the implants (2.475x103±0.320 and 1.775x103±0.125, respectively) (P=0.033). Comparison between connections was statistically different for groups PC and O, outside and inside the implants (P=0.000).
Conclusion: Ozonated water showed effectiveness in vitro decontamination of implant-abutment interfaces in both connection types.
Keywords: Dental implant-abutment interface, ozone, decontamination, biofilm