The Influence of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Nanocomposites after Exposure to Acid Drink

Bruna C. O. Lima

School of Dentistry, State University of Western Parana (UNIOESTE), Cascavel, Parana, Brazil

Carlize Vincenzi

School of Dentistry, State University of Western Parana (UNIOESTE), Cascavel, Parana, Brazil

Juliana Royer Heidmann

School of Dentistry, State University of Western Parana (UNIOESTE), Cascavel, Parana, Brazil

Glaucia M. B. Ambrosano

Departament of Social Odontology, School of Dentistry, State University of Campinas – FOP/Unicamp, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

Virgínia Bosquiroli

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Western Parana (UNIOESTE), Cascavel, Parana, Brazil

Márcio J. Mendonça

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Western Parana (UNIOESTE), Cascavel, Parana, Brazil

Veridiana Camilotti *

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Western Parana (UNIOESTE), Cascavel, Parana, Brazil

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aims: This in vitro study evaluated the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites, after storage in acid solution for three months, with different techniques polishing systems.

Study Design: In vitro study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Western Parana (UNIOESTE), Cascavel, Parana, Brazil, between June, and October, 2014.

Methodology: A total of 280 specimens (4-mm in diameter, 2 mm thick) were fabricated for both tests (n=140 each test) in a plexiglass mold covered with a Mylar strip. After polymerization, specimens were divided into seven groups (n=20) according to the technique polishing systems: G1 – control group (no polishing treatment); G2 - Soft-Lex Discs; G3 - Diamont Master Discs; G4 - Po Go; G5 – Flexi discs; G6 – Enhance; G7 – Felt disks associated with diamond paste. All polishing systems were applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The specimens were randomly divided into two groups according to the storage solution: a) distilled water and b) Coca-Cola classic, for a period of three months at 37°C. The surface roughness values were determined using a roughness test (initially and after three months). The microhardness measurements were performed using a digital microhardness tester (initially and after three months). The mean Ra and microhardness values were submitted to the LS means analysis and Tukey-Kramer test of 5%.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between polishing systems in the roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites (p<0,05). The solution of Coca-Cola led to higher values of reduced surface roughness and microhardness values after 3 months of storage.

Conclusion: All polishing systems may be successfully used for polishing nanocomposites.

Keywords: Composite resin, dental polishing, surface roughness, microhardness


How to Cite

Lima, Bruna C. O., Carlize Vincenzi, Juliana Royer Heidmann, Glaucia M. B. Ambrosano, Virgínia Bosquiroli, Márcio J. Mendonça, and Veridiana Camilotti. 2017. “The Influence of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Nanocomposites After Exposure to Acid Drink”. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research 20 (8):1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2017/30988.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.