Comparative Evaluation of Influence of Three Different Obturation Techniques on Removal of Filling Material during Retreatment: An in vitro Study

Main Article Content

Deebah Choudhary

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the influence of various obturating techniques on retreatment teeth.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Jammu and Kashmir, India between December 2019 and February 2020.

Methodology: Sixty extracted mandibular premolars were randomly divided into three groups (n=20) based on the obturation technique adopted which endodontic treatment i.e., cold lateral compaction, thermoplasticized and GuttaFlow techniques. The samples were evaluated using micro-computed tomography for the volume before and after the retreatment to assess the remaining amount of filling material in the canals, and also the time taken for the removal of filling material during the retreatment. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Post hoc test at P < 0.05.

Results: The percentage of remaining filling material was between 17%-27%. The highest percentage of remaining filling material was seen in samples obturated with GuttaFlow (P < 0.05). The time required for retreatment was highly significant in thermoplasticized technique (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The type of obturating technique influenced the amount of filling material remained in the canal after retreatment and also the time taken during this removal.

Keywords:
Thermoplasticized technique, gutta flow, obturation, Micro-computed tomography

Article Details

How to Cite
Choudhary, D. (2020). Comparative Evaluation of Influence of Three Different Obturation Techniques on Removal of Filling Material during Retreatment: An in vitro Study. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 32(17), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2020/v32i1730638
Section
Original Research Article

References

Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. Int Endod J. 2007;40(12):921-939.

Zuolo AS, Mello JE Jr, Cunha RS, Zuolo ML, Bueno CE. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal retreatment. Int Endod J. 2013;46(10):947-953.

Yürüker S, Görduysus M, Küçükkaya S, et al. Efficacy of combined use of different nickel-titanium files on removing root canal filling materials. J Endod. 2016;42(3):487-492.

Kfir A, Tsesis I, Yakirevich E, Matalon S, Abramovitz I. The efficacy of five techniques for removing root filling material: Microscopic versus radiographic evaluation. Int Endod J. 2012;45(1):35-41.

Ingle JI, Beveridge E, Glick D, Weichman J: The Washington study. In: Ingle I, Taintor JF, editors. Endodontic. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1994.

Sönmez IS, Oba AA, Sönmez D, Almaz ME. In vitro evaluation of apical microleakage of a new MTA-based sealer. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2012;13(5):252-255.

Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Anderson RW. A comparison of thermoplastic obturation techniques: Adaptation to the canal walls. J Endod. 1997;23(11):703-706.

Budd CS, Weller RN, Kulild JC. A comparison of thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod. 1991;17(6):260-264.

Elayouti A, Achleithner C, Lost C, Weiger R. Homogeneity and adaptation of a new gutta-percha paste to root canal walls. J Endod. 2005;31(9):687–690.

Kontakiotis EG, Tzanetakis GM, Loizides AL. A 12-month longitudinal in vitro leakage study on a new silicon-based root canal filling material (GuttaFlow). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103(6):854–9.

Herbert J, Bruder M, Braunsteiner J, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT. Apical quality and adaptation of Resilon, EndoREZ, and Guttaflow root canal fillings in combination with a noncompaction technique. J Endod. 2009;35(2):261-264.

Goldberg F, Artaza LP, De Silvio A. Effectiveness of different Obturation techniques in filling of simulated lateral canals. J Endod. 2001;27(5):362-4.

Abarca AM, Bustos A, Navia M. A comparison of apical sealing and extrusion between Thermafil and lateral condensation techniques. J Endod. 2001;27(11):670-672.

Vizgirda PJ, Liewehr FR, Patton WR, McPherson JC, Buxton TB. A comparison of laterally condensed gutta-percha, thermoplasticized gutta-percha, and mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal filling materials. J Endod. 2004;30(2):103-106.

Herbert J, Bruder M, Braunsteiner J, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT. Apical Quality and Adaptation of Resilon, EndoREZ, and Guttaflow root canal fillings in combination with a noncompaction technique. J Endod. 2009;35(2):261-264.

Hegde J, Bashetty K, Kumar KK, Chikkamallaiah C. Comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of different obturation systems used over apically separated rotary nickel-titanium files: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(5):408-412.

Crozeta BM, Silva-Sousa YT, Leoni GB, et al. Micro-computed tomography study of filling material removal from oval-shaped canals by using rotary, reciprocating, and adaptive motion systems. J Endod. 2016;42(5):793-797.

Athkuri S, Mandava J, Chalasani U, Ravi RC, Munagapati VK, Chennareddy AR. Effect of different obturating techniques and sealers on the removal of filling materials during endodontic retreatment. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(6):578-82.

Rödig T, Wagner J, Wiegand A, Rizk M. Efficacy of the ProTaper retreatment system in removing Thermafil, GuttaCore or vertically compacted gutta-percha from curved root canals assessed by micro-CT. Int Endod J. 2018;51(7):808-815.

Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Krishna RG, Hannah R, Arathi G, Roohi R. Comparison of laterally condensed, vertically compacted thermoplasticized, cold free-flow GP obturations - A volumetric analysis using spiral CT. J Conserv Dent. 2009;12(4):145-149.

Jorgensen B, Williamson A, Chu R, Qian F. The efficacy of the WaveOne reciprocating file system versus the ProTaper retreatment system in endodontic retreatment of two different obturating techniques. J Endod. 2017;43(6):1011-1013.