Diagnostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Cardiovascular Disease in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study

Jung Hye Sung *

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Jackson State University, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.

Joseph Yeboah

Department of Internal Medicine / Cardiology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA

Jae Eun Lee

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Jackson State University, Jackson, Mississippi, USA and Research Centers in Minority Institutions Translational Research Network Data Coordinating Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA

Che L. Smith

DARE Global Innovations, Washington DC, USA

James G. Terry

Department of Radiology and Vanderbilt Translational and Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Mario Sims

University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA

Tandaw Samdarshi

University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA

Solomon Musani

University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA

Ervin Fox

University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA

Yaorong Ge

Department of Software and Information Systems, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

James G. Wilson

University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA

Herman A. Taylor

Cardiovascular Research Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Jeffery Carr

Department of Radiology and Vanderbilt Translational and Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Background: The role of coronary artery calcium (CAC) as a screening tool for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in African Americans (AAs) is unclear. We compared the diagnostic accuracy for CVD prevalence using the CAC score and the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) in an adult population of AAs.

Methods: CAC was measured in 2944 participants AAs. Approximately 8% of this cohort had known CVD defined as prior myocardial infarction, stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting and peripheral artery disease. Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and net reclassification index (NRI) analysis were used adjusting for age, gender, systolic blood pressure (SBP), total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, smoking status, diabetes mellitus (DM), body mass index (BMI), blood pressure medication and statin use. Participants with prevalent clinical CVD and DM were classified as high FRS risk.
Results: The mean age of participants was 60 years, 65% were females, 26% had DM, 50% were obese and 30% were current or former smokers. Prevalent CVD was associated with older age, higher SBP, lower HDL and total cholesterol, and higher CAC. The prevalence of CAC was 83% in participants with prevalent CVD and 45% in those without CVD. CAC was independently associated with prevalent CVD in our multivariable model [OR (95% CI): 1.22 (1.12 -1.32), p< 0.0001]. In ROC analysis, CAC improved the diagnostic accuracy (c statistic) of the FRS from 0.617 to 0.757 (p < 0.0001) for prevalent CVD. Addition of CAC to FRS resulted in net reclassification improvement of 4% for subjects with known CVD and 28.5% in those without CVD.
Conclusion: In AAs, CAC is independently associated with prevalent CVD and improves the diagnostic accuracy of FRS for prevalent CVD by 14%. Addition of CAC improves the NRI of those with prevalent CVD by 4% and the NRI of individuals without CVD by 28.5%. Determination of CAC may be useful in CVD risk stratification in AAs.

Keywords: Coronary artery calcium, cardiovascular disease, African Americans


How to Cite

Sung, Jung Hye, Joseph Yeboah, Jae Eun Lee, Che L. Smith, James G. Terry, Mario Sims, Tandaw Samdarshi, et al. 2015. “Diagnostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Cardiovascular Disease in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study”. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research 11 (2):1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2016/21449.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.