Prevalence of Seropositive VDRL Cases amongst Pregnant Women at the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria: Is Routine Screening for Syphilis Using VDRL Still Relevant?

Main Article Content

P. A. Awoyesuku
D. A. MacPepple
N. J. Kwosah

Abstract

Background: Untreated maternal syphilis is strongly associated with adverse birth outcomes. The WHO recommends routine serological screening in pregnancy. Some workers have advised a reappraisal of this practice, having demonstrated low seroprevalence in their antenatal population.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of seropositive VDRL cases amongst pregnant women at the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital (RSUTH) in order to justify the need and cost-effectiveness for continued routine syphilis screening using VDRL alone.

Methodology: A retrospective review of hospital and laboratory records of all pregnant women booked for antenatal care (ANC) at RSUTH in a two-year period, from May 2017 to April 2019, was carried out. Data on patients’ age, parity and educational level, and reactivity of VDRL test at booking were retrieved using structured pro-forma and analyzed using Epi Info Version 7. Test for significance using Chi-square was set at significant level of P<0.05.

Results: 3560 clinic patients had VDRL screening out of which 63 were positive. The overall prevalence rate in this study was 1.8%. The mean age was 31.5±4.7 years and the mean gestational age at booking was 22.1±6.8 weeks. There was no significant relationship between their age (χ2 = 0.403, p-value=0.940), parity (χ2 = 3.707, p-value=0.0.157), and educational status (χ2 = 1.853, p-value=0.396), and seropositivity. The cost of VDRL test per patient in RSUTH is $3, to detect the 63 cases the sum of $10,680 was spent.

Conclusion: The seroprevalence rate of syphilis in this study was low. Initial screening using VDRL alone is neither justified nor cost effective. Selective screening based on risk factors and specific test with TPHA is recommended.

Keywords:
VDRL, syphilis screening, prevalence, determinants, pregnancy, Rivers State.

Article Details

How to Cite
Awoyesuku, P. A., MacPepple, D. A., & Kwosah, N. J. (2019). Prevalence of Seropositive VDRL Cases amongst Pregnant Women at the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria: Is Routine Screening for Syphilis Using VDRL Still Relevant?. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 31(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2019/v31i430293
Section
Original Research Article

References

US Preventive Service Task Force. Screening syphilis infection: Recommendation statement. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:362-365.

Lewis DA, Young H. Syphilis. Sex Transm Inf. 2006;82:iv13-iv15.

Watson-Jones D, Oliff M, Terris-Prestholt F, et al. Antenatal syphilis screening in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons learned from Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2005;10:934-943.

World Health Organization. Guidelines for the management of sexually transmitted infections. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2001.

Osoba AO. Serological test for syphilis among hospital patients in Ibadan, 1968-1970. Proceedings of the First Medical Research Seminar, Fifty Years of Medical Research in Nigeria, 1-4 February 1972. Yaba, Lagos: Academic Press. 1972;49-52.

Ekele BA, Bello CSS. Sero-reactivity amongst pregnant women screened for syphilis at Jos University Teaching Hospital. Niger J Med. 1997;6:11-13.

Bukar M, Audu BM, Takai UI, Ajayi BB, Kullima AA. Is routine antenatal screening for syphilis in Nigeria still justified clinically and economically? Saudi Med J. 2009;30:1311-15.

Nwosu BO, Eleje GU, Obi-Nwosu AL, Ahiarakwem IF, Akujobi CN, Egwuatu CC, et al. Is routine veneral disease research laboratory test still justified? International Journal of Women’s Health. 2015;7:41-46.
Available:https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S70442

Hira S, Ratnam A, Bhat G, et al. Congenital syphilis in Lusaka-11. Incidence at birth and potential risks among hospital delivered infants. East Afr Med J. 1982;59:306-308.

Azeze B, Fantahun M, Kidan KG, Haile T. Seroprevalence of syphilis among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in a rural hospital in north west Ethiopia. Genitourin Med. 1995;71:347-350.

Hira SK, Bhat GJ, Chikamata DM. Syphilis intervention in pregnancy: Zambian demonstration project. Genitourin Med. 1990;66:159-164.

Skarpass T, Loe K. The occurrence of positive serological syphilis reactions in pregnant women in Norway 1964-1978. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1980;100:1840-43.

Klass P, Brown E, Pelton S. The incidence of prenatal syphilis at the Boston City Hospital: A comparison across four decades. Paediatrics. 1994;94:24-28.

Iyalla C, Omunakwe H, Okoh DA. A retrospective study of the seroprevalence of antibodies to HbsAg, HIV-1/2 and syphilis amongst pregnant women at booking in a tertiary hospital in Port Harcourt, Southern Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2016;15(6):86-92.
Available:https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1506028692

World Health Organization. The global elimination of congenital syphilis: Rational and strategy for action. WHO, Geneva; 2007.
Available:http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2007/9789241595858_eng.pdf
(Accessed October 2019)

WHO/TDR. Sexually transmitted diseases diagnostic initiative, evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests: Syphilis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4(Suppl 12):S33-S40.

Olubukola A, Adesina O. Routine antenatal syphilis screening in South-West Nigeria – A questionable practice. Annals of Ibadan Postgraduate Medicine. 2010;8:1.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/aipm.v8i1.63952

Obisesan KA, Ahmed Y. Routine antenatal syphilis screening – A case against. Afr J. Med. Med. Sci. 1999;28:185-187.

Ojo DA, Oyetunji IOA. Seroprevalence of syphilis among pregnant women in Oshogbo in Southwestern Nigeria. ASSET Series B. 2007;6(1):61-65.

Ikeme AC, Okeke TC. The prevalence of VDRL as routine test for pregnant women: A critical study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2006;9:65-7.

Taiwo SS, Adesiyi YO, Adekanle DA. Screening for syphilis during pregnancy in Nigeria: A practice that must continue. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83:357-9.