Socio Demographic Distribution of Ocular Axial Length in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Main Article Content

I. N. Aprioku
A. O. Adio
C. S. Ejimadu
B. Fiebai

Abstract

Aim: To determine the socio demographic distribution of ocular axial length (AL) for use in estimating intraocular lens power, detect abnormal values and possibly associate them with pathological conditions.         

Methods: This is a community based descriptive study carried out in Port Harcourt City LGA, Nigeria of subjects 18 years of age or older and with Visual Acuity > 6/18. The major ethnic/linguistic groups in Rivers state are Ikwerre, Ogoni, Ekpeye Kalabari, Okrika, Ogba, Igbani, Obolo and Etche. Socio demographic data was obtained through a proforma. Ocular examinations done included visual acuity, applanation tonometry, and ophthalmoscopy. Axial length (AL) was measured using Amplitude (A) scan ultrasonography (SONOMED PACSCAN 300AP). Data analysis was by SPSS (Version 17), and p value was set at ≤ 0.05.

Results: Four hundred and sixty six (466) subjects participated in the study made up of two hundred and twelve (212) males (45.5%) and two hundred and fifty four (254) females (54.5%) with M: F ratio of 1:1.2. The age range was 18-92 years and mean age of the subjects studied 43.0±14.2 years. Findings revealed mean AL to be 23.2±1.0 mm which was greater in males than females. The longest mean AL in males was seen among age group 51 and 60 years and that for females was seen in age group 41 and 50 years after which in both gender there was noticed to be a decline in mean axial lengths. There was no statistically significant relationship between age and axial length. Axial length was found to be longer in subjects with higher level of education and this pattern was statistically significant.

Conclusion: AL was significantly longer in males and has a positive relationship with the level of education of the study population. The longest mean AL in males was seen among age group 51 and 60 years and that for females was seen in age group 41 and 50 years after which in both gender there was noticed to be a decline in mean axial lengths.

Keywords:
Socio demographic, ocular axial length, black population.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aprioku, I. N., Adio, A. O., Ejimadu, C. S., & Fiebai, B. (2019). Socio Demographic Distribution of Ocular Axial Length in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 30(6), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2019/v30i630205
Section
Original Research Article

References

Nangia V, Jonas JB, Matin A, Kulkarni M, Sinha A, Gupta R. Body height and ocular dimensions in the adult population in rural Central India. The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248:1657–1666.

Axial length. Encycl. Ophthalmol; 2013. Available:http://www.springerreference.com/docs/html/chapterdbid/335541.html [Assessed 22 Jul, 2014]

Butterworth-Heinemann. axial length of the eye. Dict. Optom. Vis. Sci. 7th Ed. © 2009 Butterworth-Heinemann; 2009.
Available:http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/axial+length+of+the+eye
[Assessed 21 Aug, 2014]

Fotedar R, Wang JJ, Burlutsky G, Morgan IG, Rose K, Wong TY, et al. Distribution of axial length and ocular biometry measured using partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master) in an older white population. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:417–423.

Wong TY, Foster PJ, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Johnson GJ, Seah SK. Variations in ocular biometry in an adult Chinese population in Singapore: The tanjong pagar survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:73–80.

Adio AO, Onua AA, Arowolo D. Ocular axial length and keratometry readings of normal eyes in Southern Nigeria. Niger J Ophthalmol. 2010;18:12–14.

Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Miraftab M, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Abdolahinia T, et al. The distribution of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and vitreous chamber depth in an adult population of Shahroud, Iran. BMC Ophthalmol. 2012;12:50.

Lee KE, Klein BEK, Klein R, Quandt Z, Wong TY. Association of age, stature, and education with ocular dimensions in an older white population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:88–93.

Foster PJ, Broadway DC, Hayat S, Luben R, Dalzell N, Bingham S, et al. Refractive error, axial length and anterior chamber depth of the eye in British adults: The EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:827–830.

Lavanya R, Wong T-Y, Friedman DS, Aung HT, Alfred T, Gao H, et al. Determinants of angle closure in older Singaporeans. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008; 126:686–691.

Sayegh FN. The correlation of corneal refractive power, axial length, and the refractive power of the emmetropizing intraocular lens in cataractous eyes. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1996;5:328–331.

Sherpa D BB. Association between axial length of the eye and primary angle closure glaucoma. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2008;6:361–363.

Iyamu E, Iyamu JE, Amadasun G. Central corneal thickness and axial length in an adult Nigerian population. J Optom. 2013; 6:154–160.

Cekiç O, Totan Y, Aydin E, Pehlivan E, Hilmioglu F. The role of axial length in central and branch retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30:523–527.

Hoffer KJ. Axial dimension of the human cataractous lens. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111:914–918.

Pennie FC, Wood IC, Olsen C, White S, Charman WN. A longitudinal study of the biometric and refractive changes in full-term infants during the first year of life. Vis Res. 2001;41:2799–2810.

Fanny A, Ouattara A, Aka J, Coulibaly F, Gbé K, Boni S B-CR, Konan-Touré ML AC. Ocular biometric values of the black African patient and theoretical consideration of the role of these values in various pathologies: Analysis of 325 eyes. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007;30:68–72.

Trivedi RH, Wilson ME. Axial length measurements by contact and immersion techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:498–502.

Watson A, Armstrong R. Contact or immersion technique for axial length measurement? Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999;27:49–51.

JJ Kanski BB. Clinical ophthalmology: A systematic approach. In: Clinical Ophthalmology: A systematic approach. Elsiever Saunders. 2011;650–652.

Jivrajka R, Shammas MC, Boenzi T, Swearingen M, Shammas HJ. Variability of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness in the cataractous eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34: 289–294.

Koibuchi H, Hayakawa K, Uehara T, Ogido T, Nagataki S, Suzuki M. Anterior chamber dimensions in normal subjects on Kume Island, Okinawa. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn. 1993;97: 1185–1192.

Pereira GC, Allemann N. Ocular biometry, refractive error and its relationship with height, age, sex and education in Brazilian adults. Arq Bras Oftamol. 2007;70:487–493.

Igbinedion BO, Ogbeide OU. Measurement of normal ocular volume by the use of computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2013;16:315–319.

Ogbeide OU, Omoti AE. Ultrasonographic ocular diameters in Nigerians. West Afr J Med. 2009;28:97–101.

Uranchimeg D, Yip JLY, Lee PS, Wickremasinghe S, Wong TY, Foster PJ. Cross-sectional differences in axial length of young adults living in urban and rural communities in Mongolia. Asian J Ophthalmol. 2005;7:133–139.

Yin G, Wang YX, Zheng ZY, Yang H, Xu L, Jonas JB. Ocular axial length and its associations in Chinese: The Beijing Eye Study. PLoS One. 2012;7: 43172.

Connell B, Brian G BM. A case-control study of biometry in healthy and cataractous Eritrean eyes. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1997;4:151–155.